Is the Court a Justice System — or a Tax‑Free Trading House?
- jubbdavid
- 8 hours ago
- 1 min read
What if courts aren’t just ruling on cases, but quietly converting people and property into commercial instruments? This episode questions whether venue shifts, probate drafting, and title conversion are being used to strip common‑law protections under color of law—turning living men and women into “infant” presumptions, and property into tradable assets without verified claims, wet‑ink consent, or consideration.
From bid bonds written after rulings, to notes traded as securities, to prosecutors acting as beneficiaries, the conversation pulls on threads most never see. Are courts incentivized to move matters out of common law and into administrative probate for profit? Are bonds, derivatives, and assumed abandonment being used to mature charges past nine months and monetize private property? These questions go straight at jurisdiction, consent, and the line between law and commerce.
The discussion expands into trusts, equity, and defense of title: why properly structured dynasty trusts remove assets from probate, how consent is required for mandates to have force, and why equity acts in personam—not against abstractions. If law flows from “We the People,” what happens when policy masquerades as law and agreement is presumed instead of proven?
If you’ve ever felt something was wrong but couldn’t name it, listen to the full podcast. This episode breaks down jurisdiction, consent, bonds, trusts, and property rights in detail—so you can see the mechanics for yourself and decide where you actually stand.