Three Ways to Respond

You have to think about polarization, which is looking for the opposite, for what's obscure, what doesn't fit; it's like, why is somebody doing that?  I think you should look at that; because if somebody is, it's because they want to hide something, or they want to destroy intelligence. 

  So there are two modes that somebody could have; and those are modes where agreement is, and you can get everything with these three modes!  So what happens when somebody falls into ad hominem, as an influential logic; but it's not- it's a fallacy, why?  Because where somebody would just jump into someone's personal character, and blame, fault, and things like that; they've lost the subject, and they've gone to show that there's some weakness where the subject is; so that they've gone into ad hominem instead. 

  And so rather than having rapport, having a familiarity; have you ever considered that when you have a lot of “don't, won’t, can’t, should, try, but, must, only, never, always”, you're using modal operators of necessity; but what happens when you have a question in front, like you say, “I wonder if it's possible”; these are modal operators of possibility.  

  So as listening is, it's important that you'd want to keep listening, wouldn't it be?  Yes; and you do, because you've got two modes of sorting information about agreement: one is agreement, the other is agreement with condition; and so that satisfies two other ways of processing information; and the third way is polarization; and that's the opposite; it's sorting for the opposite.

  Where somebody is empty in their mind- how good is that?  Whereas some thinking is there, is there some fatal logic, where any error is, that nobody was really taught?  Where you are in your internal dialogue, how could you be listening at the same time?  You can't, no; by the degree to which somebody has got all that internal dialogue, you can have not been really listening. 

  So there's three ways that exist; and it's just math, OK?  And there's no more choice that exists.  How are you sorting information?  You've got a random phoneme generator, right there, between your Wernicke's and Broca's area; and it's like podded, designed for you to have kinesthetic motor sequencing; which is the way that you move your tongue, and the shape of your lips and glottis, and you've got dental and nasal areas or cavities; and how are these being used?  It's really your motor sequencing behavior that allows you to code or decode what's being said.

  So you've got verbal and non-verbals. And you've just got these three ways to process information; so, what if everyone focuses more on getting agreement?  Or no, they're not- it's the opposite; it's polarization; and how are you going to get any agreement when you're polarizing people?  It's going to be not too good; it's the opposite, where any search is to perform, and where aversion was triggered instead; that's called limited mind functioning.

  So something is intelligent, where somebody is adverse; is that a strategy? Yes, it can be; because where somebody's mind was a little bit scrambled, whatever is said that makes sense, is going to go in, afterward; but where somebody is mind reading, its going to be the worst; because someone's pointing out what someone else is thinking, and how can you do that?  You can't.  So that would be one of the worst things that anybody could do, to be thinking that I've got the thought of someone else's thought; 90% of most people thinking is just that.  It's really off the chart wrong; so if you realize, I can't have anybody else's thought, you drop it; and when it's dropped, 90% of all the chatter that's been in your head is gone; it's possible to be able to be with your spontaneous creative intelligence more. 

  So it's the master of self where you are if you're honoring a stranger; because where anybody when you've given them to be elevated, they're going to fall back into you!  So how are you, or I, or anybody, really, going to be able to know someone else?  You can't!  Most people haven't even spent time to be able to know who they are, and have no definition of I or you; they can't dance around any of those words. So what is you where you're in this living state?  It's having awareness over perception; and it's living or loving; and giving love or life; you can't give love; you can't give life.  Life is and love is; and it's something inside; and it's not something on the outside that anybody could be given. 

  If you can understand for another, you can't do the understanding for another; you can't do the loving for another either; that's something that they have to do, or you are I, inside ourselves; and it's a matter of fact; and so, what's cause and effect where violation is, it's really a lot of complex equivalents otherwise; missing referential indexes; and selective restrictive violations where most people’s thinking is.

  So, two negatives to make a positive in social compacts; it's a bit ridiculous where someone is presenting something like that- it's called forked tongue; if you look, you could see what's the pattern going on; what's the preferred mode of sorting information?  Is it seeking agreement?  Is it agreement with condition?  Or is it polarized?  There's just these three ways that you could process information.  

  Could you receive everything in your life, that you'd remain more grateful where you are?  Definitely.  All unknown allies all come forward as a result of your integrity!  It’s wise somebody would be aware where their language is, your verbal and your non-verbal; and why not have whole brain functioning pattern and look into this mapping, and see where aversion is; and where interest and pleasure is instead; and what is the seriousness that goes on where some limited mind functioning was; and how backward, and full of confusion, fear, and rejection; and is that the state that you wanted to create?  Most people say no; and if it was, that's what you did- was it just knee-jerked?  Yes, it was. 

  So having reflection; and having the word room in your life, and bringing the word room in as a word, is really good; because otherwise it's just an attack on another person's personal self, which is ad hominum; and that's a fallacy; and it just shows you an attack where someone is saying that it's an argument.  I could say that this is a conversation- can we be having a conversation?  That's really good; because that's about conversing; and everyone is giving you their model of the world; so, polarized, all that you've given them is an argument.

  So looking at a diversion, where someone would say, oh, well, this could be marketed because it's such a good idea; what we've got is a product which is orthophilic, meaning straight with nature; and so you describe what sort of a magnesium might this be in relation to other sorts of magnesium, or something else on the market.  Somebody could be given something so clean, so simple, so beautiful, and all they could do is to polarize, because it's knee jerk; and so this is just absolute immaturity; 

  So, could you imagine, someone who's just hypnotized; all they're using is normalizations; meaning they're taking some action, and just turning it into a noun; they never use a proper true verb, and use unspecified verbs; and using straw man argument; and equivalent sorts of slippery slope, and bandwagon appeal?  Those are sorts of things not logical whatsoever. 

  So where a question is, somebody could have looked into Whole Brain Functioning, Patterning; it really would be, what is this which we're talking about, these three modes of sorting information that relate to your own personal development; and could you say that this isn't something which you could be getting benefit from?  And what happens where you're able to recognize things more like this?  So you can see where somebody's a lot of got a lot of: “don’t, won’t, can’t, should, try, but, must, only”, and they're cutting the air, and frowning and their lips are pressed together and look really mean; and have you looked in the mirror to see, how the emotion shaped your face?  Do you have a basically happy face, or maybe you just got a face which is mean?  It's mean as cat poop. 

  So where somebody's been polarising, they only have focused on a lot of: “don’t, won’t, can’t, should, try, but, must, only” and they dissociated in life, and distracted; and then anything said they'll interrogate to make anybody else smaller; otherwise it's just, like, intimidation; and these are the things that somebody feels this is what you do to have success?  Somebody was a bully, and someone wanted to be the bully, and they certainly didn't want to be the one that was bullied. 

  So what's the common sense where anything is and what's innate? It's innate- your capacity and mine, to be social- you’re born with this instinct, that's an instinct; so, it's wise anyone could act positively always, and be where you're professional; and professional in your outside life, and so too in your internal life where things are; and this is a domestic currency; so that's not negative; that's a feeling; this is a pattern and you’ve to be able to recognize things, like what we're talking about here. 

  You've got three ways of processing information; two of these ways that you could easily get everything done, could be the ways that you are getting agreement; and so you're going to have success where you are, aren't you?  So somebody will say, oh no, this person didn't get agreement and did they have any success?  No, not really.  Because, could you agree to disagree, and you're staying with agreement?  You’re getting a recognition where something is being looked more and it's clearly placed; otherwise, it's just knee-jerk reacted; it's ad hominum; and what's chosen is just more of an attack of the other person's private personal life in general; and it just shows how weak everything is. 

So there's three modes of the mind; and there's that hidden trap that we've just talked about; it's how polarization just completely destroys intelligence, and what's ad hominem where a symptom is, that's just the polarized mind that can't see itself; and can you or anyone else think for anyone else?  No, that would be just a very fatal logic; stick with what's going on inside your own self; be more sensory based about what you're tracking; otherwise you've got a fatal logic, and an error; and shouldn't you look into this?

jubbdavid.com/book-online